perinatologyРоссийский вестник перинатологии и педиатрииRossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics)1027-40652500-2228Ltd. “The National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation”perinatology-251Research ArticleОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫREVIEWSНеинвазивная вентиляция легких у недоношенных новорожденных с респираторным дистресс-синдромомNon-invasive ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndromeМиткиновО. Э.MitkinovO. E.

к.м.н., зав. каф. последипломного образования медицинского факультета Бурятского государственного университета 670000 Улан-Удэ, ул. Смолина, д. 24а

ГорбачевВ. И.GorbachevV. I.

д.м.н., проф., зав. каф. анестезиологии и реаниматологии Иркутской государственной медицинской академии последипломного образования 664079 Иркутск, м-н Юбилейный, д. 100

Бурятский государственный университет, Улан-УдэРоссияBuryat State University, Ulan-UdeRussian FederationИркутская государственная медицинская академия последипломного образованияРоссияIrkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate EducationRussian Federation2014160320165931721Copyright © Ltd. “The National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation”, 20162016Ltd. “The National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation”Ltd. “The National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation”https://www.ped-perinatology.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.ped-perinatology.ru/jour/article/view/251

В обзоре современной литературы освещены основные проблемы применения неинвазивной вентиляции у недоношенных новорожденных. Определены преимущества и недостатки использования различных устройств и методов. Представлены критерии эффективности и предикторы неудач неинвазивной вентиляции. В настоящее время неинвазивные методы вентиляции у недоношенных новорожденных находят все большее применение в стационарах любого уровня и используются даже у самых маленьких пациентов.

The review of modern literature covers main problems in the use of non-invasive ventilation in preterm infants. The advantages and disadvantages of various devices and methods are identified. The criteria for the efficiency of non-invasive ventilation and the predictors of its failure are presented. At the moment, non-invasive ventilation methods are increasingly being used in preterm infants at hospitals at any level and even in the smallest patients.

недоношенные новорожденныереспираторный дистресс-синдромнеинвазивная вентиляция легких.preterm infantsrespiratory distress syndromenon-invasive ventilation.ReferencesАлександрович Ю.С., Пшениснов К.В. Интенсивная терапия новорожденных. Руководство для врачей. Ст-Петер-бург: изд-во Н-Л 2013; 672. (AlexandrovichU.S., Pshenisnov K.V. Neonatal Intensive Care. Guidelines for physicians. St-Petersburg: N-L Publisher, 2013; 672.)Александрович Ю.С., Пшениснов К.В. Интенсивная терапия новорожденных. Руководство для врачей. Ст-Петер-бург: изд-во Н-Л 2013; 672. (AlexandrovichU.S., Pshenisnov K.V. Neonatal Intensive Care. Guidelines for physicians. St-Petersburg: N-L Publisher, 2013; 672.)Мостовой А.В., Александрович Ю.С., Сапун О.И. Влияние сроков введения сурфактанта на исходы у новорожденных с низкой и экстремально низкой массой тела. Анестезиол и реаниматол 2009; 1: 43—46. (Mostovoy A.V., Alexandrovich U.S., Sapun O.I. Effect of timing of surfactant administration on the outcome of infants with low andМостовой А.В., Александрович Ю.С., Сапун О.И. Влияние сроков введения сурфактанта на исходы у новорожденных с низкой и экстремально низкой массой тела. Анестезиол и реаниматол 2009; 1: 43—46. (Mostovoy A.V., Alexandrovich U.S., Sapun O.I. Effect of timing of surfactant administration on the outcome of infants with low andextremely low birth weight. Anesteziol i reanimatol 2009; 1: 43-46.)extremely low birth weight. Anesteziol i reanimatol 2009; 1: 43-46.)Goldsmith J.P., Karotkin E.H. Assisted ventilation of the neonate. 5th Edition, Saunders, 2010; 656.Goldsmith J.P., Karotkin E.H. Assisted ventilation of the neonate. 5th Edition, Saunders, 2010; 656.Баранов А.А. (ред.). Современные подходы к профилактике, диагностике и лечению бронхолегочной диспла-зии. Руководство для практических врачей. М 2013; 176. (Baranov A.A. (ed.). Current approaches to prevention, diagnosis and treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Guide for practitioners. Moscow 2013; 176.)Баранов А.А. (ред.). Современные подходы к профилактике, диагностике и лечению бронхолегочной диспла-зии. Руководство для практических врачей. М 2013; 176. (Baranov A.A. (ed.). Current approaches to prevention, diagnosis and treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Guide for practitioners. Moscow 2013; 176.)Donn S.M., Sinha S.K. Minimising ventilator induced lung injury in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child F Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: 3: 226-230.Donn S.M., Sinha S.K. Minimising ventilator induced lung injury in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child F Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: 3: 226-230.Gortner Т., Misselwitz В., Milligan D. et al. Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm neonates in Europe: results from the MOSAIC cohort. Neonatology 2010; 99: 2: 112-117.Gortner Т., Misselwitz В., Milligan D. et al. Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm neonates in Europe: results from the MOSAIC cohort. Neonatology 2010; 99: 2: 112-117.lobe A.IT. The new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011; 23: 2: 167-172.lobe A.IT. The new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011; 23: 2: 167-172.Гордеев В.И., Александрович Ю.С., Паршин Е.В. Респираторная поддержка у детей. Руководство для врачей. Ст-Петербург: ЭЛБИ-СПб 2009; 176. (Gordeev V.I., Alexandrovich U.S., Parshin E.V. Respiratory support in children. Guidelines for physicians. St-Petersburg: ELBY-SPb 2009; 176.)Гордеев В.И., Александрович Ю.С., Паршин Е.В. Респираторная поддержка у детей. Руководство для врачей. Ст-Петербург: ЭЛБИ-СПб 2009; 176. (Gordeev V.I., Alexandrovich U.S., Parshin E.V. Respiratory support in children. Guidelines for physicians. St-Petersburg: ELBY-SPb 2009; 176.)Ионов О.В., РындинА.Ю., Антонов А.Г. и др. Сурфактант-ная терапия в комплексном лечении респираторной патологии у глубоконедоношенных детей. Рос вестн пе-ринатол и педиатр 2013; 3: 108—114. (Ionov O.V., Ryndin A.U., Antonov A.G., et al. Surfactant therapy in treatment of respiratory disease in extremely premature infants. Ros Vestn Perinatal i Pediatr 2013; 3: 108—114.)Ионов О.В., РындинА.Ю., Антонов А.Г. и др. Сурфактант-ная терапия в комплексном лечении респираторной патологии у глубоконедоношенных детей. Рос вестн пе-ринатол и педиатр 2013; 3: 108—114. (Ionov O.V., Ryndin A.U., Antonov A.G., et al. Surfactant therapy in treatment of respiratory disease in extremely premature infants. Ros Vestn Perinatal i Pediatr 2013; 3: 108—114.)Байбарина Е.Н., Дегтярев Д.Н., Широкова В.И. Интенсивная терапия и принципы выхаживания детей с экстремально низкой и очень низкой массой тела при рождении. Методическое письмо. М 2011; 70. (Baybarina E.N., Degtyarev D.N., Shirokova V.I. Intensive therapy and principles of nursing children with extremely low and very low birthweight. Guidelines. Moscow 2011; 70.)Байбарина Е.Н., Дегтярев Д.Н., Широкова В.И. Интенсивная терапия и принципы выхаживания детей с экстремально низкой и очень низкой массой тела при рождении. Методическое письмо. М 2011; 70. (Baybarina E.N., Degtyarev D.N., Shirokova V.I. Intensive therapy and principles of nursing children with extremely low and very low birthweight. Guidelines. Moscow 2011; 70.)Finer N.N., Carlo W.A., Walsh M.C. et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. New Engl J Med 2010; 362: 21: 1970-1979.Finer N.N., Carlo W.A., Walsh M.C. et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. New Engl J Med 2010; 362: 21: 1970-1979.Kattwinkel I., Perlman J.M., Aziz K. et al. Part 15: neonatal resuscitation 2010 american heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010; 122:18: Suppl3: 909—919.Kattwinkel I., Perlman J.M., Aziz K. et al. Part 15: neonatal resuscitation 2010 american heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010; 122:18: Suppl3: 909—919.Sweet D.G., Carnielli V., Greisen G. et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—2010 update. Neonatology 2010; 97: 4: 402-417.Sweet D.G., Carnielli V., Greisen G. et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—2010 update. Neonatology 2010; 97: 4: 402-417.Morley C.J, Davis P.G., Doyle L.W. et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. New Engl J Med 2008; 358: 7: 700-708.Morley C.J, Davis P.G., Doyle L.W. et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. New Engl J Med 2008; 358: 7: 700-708.De Paoli A. G, Davis P. G., Faber B. et al. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2002; 4: CD002977.De Paoli A. G, Davis P. G., Faber B. et al. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2002; 4: CD002977.Bober K., Swietlinski I., Zejda J. et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13: 2: 191-196.Bober K., Swietlinski I., Zejda J. et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13: 2: 191-196.Gupta S., Sinha S.K., Tin W. et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Post-extubation Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Driver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. J Pediatr 2009; 154: 5: 645—650.Gupta S., Sinha S.K., Tin W. et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Post-extubation Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Driver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. J Pediatr 2009; 154: 5: 645—650.YaguiAC, Vale L.A., HaddadL.B. et al. Bubble CPAP versus CPAP with variable flow in newborns with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatric (Rio J) 2011; 87: 6: 499-504.YaguiAC, Vale L.A., HaddadL.B. et al. Bubble CPAP versus CPAP with variable flow in newborns with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatric (Rio J) 2011; 87: 6: 499-504.Kieran E.A., Twomey A.R., Molloy E.J. et al. Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130: 5: 1170—1176.Kieran E.A., Twomey A.R., Molloy E.J. et al. Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130: 5: 1170—1176.Davis P.G., Lemyre В., De Paoli A.G. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuousDavis P.G., Lemyre В., De Paoli A.G. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuouspositive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database of Syst Reviews 2003; 3: CD003212.positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database of Syst Reviews 2003; 3: CD003212.Friedlich P., Lecart C, Posen R. et al. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants following extubation. J Perinatal 1999; 19: 413-418.Friedlich P., Lecart C, Posen R. et al. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants following extubation. J Perinatal 1999; 19: 413-418.Barrington K.J., Finer N.N., Bull D. Randomised controlled trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 638-641.Barrington K.J., Finer N.N., Bull D. Randomised controlled trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 638-641.KhalafM.N., Brodsky N., Hurley I., Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 13-17.KhalafM.N., Brodsky N., Hurley I., Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 13-17.Tang S., Zhao J., Shen J. et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatrics 2013; 50: 4: 371-376.Tang S., Zhao J., Shen J. et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatrics 2013; 50: 4: 371-376.Meneses J., Bhandari V., Alves J.G. Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166: 4: 372-376.Meneses J., Bhandari V., Alves J.G. Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166: 4: 372-376.Millar D., Kirpalani ТТ., Temyre B. et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) does not confer benefit over nasal CPAP (NCPAP) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants - an international randomised trial. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97: 133-134.Millar D., Kirpalani ТТ., Temyre B. et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) does not confer benefit over nasal CPAP (NCPAP) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants - an international randomised trial. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97: 133-134.Tapia J.T., Urzua S., Bancalari A. Randomized trial of early bubble continuous positive airway pressure for very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 1: 75—80.Tapia J.T., Urzua S., Bancalari A. Randomized trial of early bubble continuous positive airway pressure for very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 1: 75—80.Aftab S., Gerdes J.S. Delivery Room Management of RDS. J Pulmon Resp Med S 2013; 13: 1—7.Aftab S., Gerdes J.S. Delivery Room Management of RDS. J Pulmon Resp Med S 2013; 13: 1—7.Kirpalani H., Millar D., Temyre B. et al. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. New Engl J Med 2013; 369: 7: 611-620.Kirpalani H., Millar D., Temyre B. et al. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. New Engl J Med 2013; 369: 7: 611-620.AmmariA., Suri M., Milisavljevic V. et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 3: 341—347.AmmariA., Suri M., Milisavljevic V. et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 3: 341—347.Aly ТТ., Massaro A.N., Patel K., El-Mohandes A.A. Is it safer to intubate premature infants in the delivery room? Pediatrics 2005; 115: 6: 1660-1665.Aly ТТ., Massaro A.N., Patel K., El-Mohandes A.A. Is it safer to intubate premature infants in the delivery room? Pediatrics 2005; 115: 6: 1660-1665.Sandri F., Plavka R., Ancora G. Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: 6: 1402-1409.Sandri F., Plavka R., Ancora G. Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: 6: 1402-1409.Fuchs ТТ., Tindner W., Teiprecht A. et al. Predictors of early nasal CPAP failure and effects of various intubation criteria on the rate of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants of <29 weeks gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96: 5: 343-347.Fuchs ТТ., Tindner W., Teiprecht A. et al. Predictors of early nasal CPAP failure and effects of various intubation criteria on the rate of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants of <29 weeks gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96: 5: 343-347.De Taegere A.P., van der Tee Т.Н., Cante C, van Kaam A.IT. Early prediction of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation. ActaPaediatr2012; 101: 4: 374-379.De Taegere A.P., van der Tee Т.Н., Cante C, van Kaam A.IT. Early prediction of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation. ActaPaediatr2012; 101: 4: 374-379.Rocha G., Flor-de-Tima F., Proenca С et al. Failure of early nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants of 26 to 30 weeks geststion. J Perinatal 2013; 33: 297—301.Rocha G., Flor-de-Tima F., Proenca С et al. Failure of early nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants of 26 to 30 weeks geststion. J Perinatal 2013; 33: 297—301.Dargaville PA., Aiyappan A., De Paoli A.G. Continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences. Neonatology 2013; 104: 1: 8-14.Dargaville PA., Aiyappan A., De Paoli A.G. Continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences. Neonatology 2013; 104: 1: 8-14.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.