Markers of genomic instability in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2019-64-6-73-78
Abstract
Research purpose. To determine the state of the genome instability in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and to assess its dependence on biological (age and sex) and clinical (form and variant of the flow of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, its activity, duration, functional class and serotype of the patient) parameters.
Material and methods: 95 children were surveyed. Among them, 68 (39 girls and 29 boys) – with various forms of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, 12 – without treatment (at the stage of verification of the diagnosis). The control group consisted of 15 conditionally healthy children aged 3 to 16 years. To assess the genome instability, the method of determination of micronuclei in peripheral blood binuclear lymphocytes under the conditions of a cytochalasin block (in vitro) was used.
Results: All examined children in the active form of the disease showed a significant increase in the level of binuclear lymphocytes with micronuclei in lymphocytes compared with a group of conditionally healthy children. The maximum values of this indicator were observed in the age group from 5 to 10 years and in children with a disease duration of up to 1 year. As the activity of the process increases, the level of binuclear lymphocytes with micronuclei rises. After treatment, a significant decrease in the indicator content was detected in patients with the II degree of disease activity in both cases of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
Conclusion. Statistically significant increase in the level of binuclear lymphocytes with micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes may indicate the formation of genome instability in children as a pathogenetic part in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
About the Authors
T. P. MakarovaRussian Federation
Kazan
M. S. Ilina
Russian Federation
Kazan
References
1. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Textbook. A.A. Baranov, E.I. Alekseev, P.F. Litvitsky (eds). Moscow: VEDI, 2017; 368 (in Russ.)
2. Zholobova E.S., Shakhbazyan I.E. Ulybina O.V. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Guide to pediatric rheumatology. H.A. Geppe, N.S. Podchernyaeva, G.A. Lyyskina (eds). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2011; 162–245 (in Russ.)
3. Ramos V.A., Ramos P.A., Dominguez C. The role of oxidative stress inflammation in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Jornal de Pediatria 2000; 76(2):125–32. DOI: 0.2223/JPED.45
4. Chou P. H., Kageyama S., Matsuda S. Detection of lipid peroxidation – induced DNA adducts caused by 4-oxo-2(E)nonenal and 4-oxo-2(E)-hexenal in human autopsy tissues. Chem Res Toxicol 2010; 23(9): 1442–1448. DOI: 10.1021/tx100047d
5. Demirkaya E., Cok I., Durmaz E. Genotoxicity of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 15(62): 73–77. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20150024
6. Rokhlina F.V., Novik G.A. Experience in determining serum methotrexate concentration in children of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Proc. of the 1st All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation “Innovations in the nation’s health” 2013; 1: 62–63 (in Russ.)
7. Mihel’s Kh., Nikishina I.P., Fedorov E.S., Salugina S.O. Genetic engineering biological therapy of juvenile arthritis. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya 2011; 1: 78–93 (in Russ.)
8. Kravchenko I.E., Fazylov V.Kh., Semenov V.V. Cellular genome instability in pathological states of infectious genesis. Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni 2010; 4: 47–50 (in Russ.)
9. Fenech M., Bonassi S., Turner J. Human Micro Nucleus project. Intraand inter-laboratory variation in the scoring of micronuclei and nucleoplasmic bridges in binucleated human lymphocytes. Results of an international slide-scoring exercise by the HUMN project. Mutat Res 2006; 534(1–2): 45–64.
Review
For citations:
Makarova T.P., Ilina M.S. Markers of genomic instability in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2019;64(6):73-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2019-64-6-73-78