Preview

Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics)

Advanced search

Difficulties in monitoring of premature infants in outpatient facilities (third stage of nursing)

https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2021-66-6-108-114

Abstract

Premature birth remains an urgent problem of modern healthcare around the world. At the same time, the improvement of neonatal care for premature babies has led to a significant decrease in infant mortality and an increase in the survival rate of children with very low and extremely low body weight. Nursing and monitoring such children requires a special approach. A premature baby has one or more reasons for the early development of chronic pathology and needs a long-term, differentiated, continuous monitoring, provided a clear continuity of all stages of nursing.

The article presents the results of observation of premature babies in 20 polyclinics of Saint Petersburg in the first year of life at the time of the study. The authors analyzed medical histories (form 112/y) of 88 children born prematurely (from 22 to 36 weeks of gestation). It has been determined that most often the dispensary observation groups include children with pathology of the central nervous system, organs of vision, and surgical pathology. Insufficient coverage with vaccine prophylaxis (from 33 to 78% for various vaccine-preventable infections) was revealed not only with additional drugs for the risk group, but also with the main vaccinations of the National Calendar. Monitoring premature babies, their rehabilitation and habilitation are the responsibility of the third (outpatient) level of nursing. However, the lack of uniform approaches to dispensary observation, rehabilitation treatment of premature babies, the lack of clear routing create difficulties in the management of such children in a polyclinic. The authors proposed options for solving this important problem in order to increase the efficiency of the primary pediatric care for premature babies at the place of residence of the child.

About the Authors

I. V. Koltuntseva
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



L. V. Sakhno
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



S. V. Bairova
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



T. V. Mishkina
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



M. O. Revnova
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Cousens S., Blencowe H., Stanton C., Chou D., Ahmed S., Steinhardt L. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 2011; 377(9774): 1319–1330. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0

2. Arhipova M.Yu., Zaharova S.Yu. Health status of very premature infants. status evaluation in extremely premature infants. Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii 2016; 61(1): 32–36. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2016-61-1-32-36

3. Blencowe H., Cousens S., Mullany L.C., Lee A.C., Kerber K., Wall S. Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health 2011; 11(3): 64–75. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S11

4. Vinogradova I.V., Krasnov M.V. The state of health of children with extremely low weight at birth in remote periods of life. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny 2013; 6 (1): 20. (in Russ.)

5. Guidelines for perinatology. Editor D.O. Ivanova. Inform-Navigator; 2015: 1080. (in Russ.)

6. Valiulina A.Ya., Ahmadeeva E.N., Kryvkina N.N. The problems and perspectives of successful resuscitation and rehabilitation of children born with low and extremely low birth weight. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny 2013; 6 (1): 34–41. (in Russ.)

7. Spittle A.G., Ferreti C., Anderson P.J., Orton G., Eeles A., Bates L. et al. Improving the outcome of infants born at <30 weeks’ gestation – a randomized controlled trial of preventative care at home. BMC pediatr 2009; 3 (9): 73. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-73

8. Fil’kina O.M., Vorob’eva E.A., Dolotova N.V., Matveeva E.A., Malyshkina A.I., Gadzhimuradova N.D. Risk factors and prediction chart of violation algorithm of health of the one year-olds born with very low and extremely low birth weight. Analiz riska zdorov’yu 2016; 13(1): 69–76. (in Russ.)

9. Matveeva E.A., Fil’kina O.M., Malyshkina A.I., Nazarov S.B., Dolotova N.V., Upovalov S.A. Disability of infants born with a body weight of less than 1500 grams. Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii 2017; 62(3): 62–70. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2017-62-3-66-70

10. Shavaliev R.F., Kletenkova G.R., Gajnetdinova D.D. Phasing multidisciplinary rehabilitation of newborns with perinatal in child hospital. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny 2013; 6(1): 90–94. (in Russ.)

11. Ahmadeeva E.N., Valiulina A.Ya., Kryvkina N.N. The impact of neonatal resuscitation for somatic status and psychomotor development of premature infants who suffer from critical situations during newborn period. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny 2013; 6 (1): 12–16. (in Russ.)

12. Nekrasova N.V., Fedyanina E.A., Plotnikova O.A. Medical and social aspects of disability among prematurely born children. Ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya 2013; 4: 15–17. (in Russ.)

13. Glass H.C., Costarino A.T., Stayer S.A., Brett C.M., Cladis F., Davis P.J. Outcomes for Extremely Premature Infants. Anesthesia Analgesia 2015; 120(6): 1337–1351. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000705

14. Lebedeva O.V., Polyanina E.Z., Kirilochev O.K., Kashirskaya E.I. Abilitation of very premature newborns: significance and prospects for development. Astrakhanskii meditsinskii zhurnal 2019; 1(14): 17–27. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.17021/2019.14.1.17.27

15. Volyanyuk E.V., Safina A.I. Integrated rehabilitation premature infants in the first year of life. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny. 2013; 6 (6): 59–62. (in Russ.)

16. Voroshilina K.I., Rovda Yu.I. Quality of life in premature babies with low, very low and extremely low birth weight, according to follow-up in perinatal center. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya 2015; (6): 92. (in Russ.)

17. Zaharova L.I., Kol’cova N.S., Tupikova S.A., Kulikova N.I. Premature newborn as a multidisciplinary problem and its solution at the present stage. Prakticheskaya meditsina 2016; 8(100): 19–22. (in Russ.)

18. Shabalov N.P. Ethical problems in neonatology. Pediatriya 2016; 95 (4): 58–62. (in Russ.)

19. Liu L., Johnson H.L., Cousens S., Perin J., Scott S., Lawn J.E. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 2012; 379(9832): 2151–2161. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1

20. Fedorova L.A. Psychomotor development and rehabilitation methods in preterm infants after discharge. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny 2014; 7 (6): 62–63. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Koltuntseva I.V., Sakhno L.V., Bairova S.V., Mishkina T.V., Revnova M.O. Difficulties in monitoring of premature infants in outpatient facilities (third stage of nursing). Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2021;66(6):108-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2021-66-6-108-114

Views: 562


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1027-4065 (Print)
ISSN 2500-2228 (Online)