

Causes of obstructive uropathy in children, inflammatory and neurogenic disorders of urine outflow
https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2025-70-3-26-35
Abstract
Megaureter is one of the most common pathologies of the upper urinary tract, which is dangerous in childhood due to possible complications such as chronic urinary tract infections with the outcome of chronic kidney disease. Currently, the international classification based on the totality of excretory urography, voiding cystography, urethrocystoscopy and urodynamics data, which includes 4 groups of megaureters: reflux, obstructive, non-reflux and non-obstructive, as well as vesicular megaureter, has received the greatest relevance for the differentiation of megaureter. Clinically, this pathology can occur in 2 periods — aseptic and infectious. The doctor should be alerted to complaints of abdominal pain unrelated to eating and defecation, abdominal asymmetry, episodes of fever, profuse sweating, a history of recurrent urinary tract infections, and lag in physical development. A number of standard and special laboratory and instrumental studies are used to diagnose the megaureter. The introduction of antenatal ultrasound diagnostics of the urinary system organs into practice has increased the chance of detecting a megaureter in the prenatal period. Treatment of a megaureter depends on its cause and the degree of enlargement and tortuosity of the ureter. Both operative and conservative methods of megaureter correction are used. If conservative tactics are futile, endoscopic correction of the ureteral orifice, dissection of the orifice, ureteral stenting, and balloon dilation are used, depending on the cause. In the absence of the effect of these methods, neoimplantation of the ureter into the bladder is used. Conservative treatment includes drug therapy and physiotherapy methods of treatment in conjunction with physical therapy. In case of an existing urinary tract infection, it is advisable to prescribe antibacterial therapy.
About the Authors
S. S. NikitinRussian Federation
185910, Petrozavodsk; Petrozavodsk, 185002
N. B. Guseva
Russian Federation
123317, Moscow; 125412, Moscow; 125993, Moscow
A. A. Tyukina
Russian Federation
185910, Petrozavodsk
References
1. Shamov B.K., Sharkov S.M., Yacyk S.P. Modern views on the pathogenesis of megaureter formation in children. Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya, 2008; 5 (6): 123–124 (in Russ.)
2. Ahmedov I.Yu., Yacyk S.P., Ahmedov Yu.M. Megaureter in childhood (literature review). J. of Reproductive Health and Uro-nephrology Research, 2023; 4 (1): 6–10 (in Russ.)
3. Gusev R.V., Gavrilova T.V., Trefilov A.A., Il’in M.V. Differentiated approach to the treatment of congenital megaureter in children. Aktual’nye voprosy detskoj uronefrologii, 2019; 146–149. (in Russ.)
4. Pugachev A.G. Pediatric urology. GEOTAR-Media, 2009; 832 (in Russ.)
5. Yushko E.I. Megaureter in children: terminology, classification, clinical picture, diagnostics, treatment. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta, 2006; 5 (4): 65–71 (in Russ.)
6. Hodges Steve J., Werle D., McLorie G., Atala A. Megaureter. Scientific World Journal, 2010; 13 (10): 603–612. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2010.54
7. Sharkov S.M., Smirnov I.E., Yacyk S.P. Megaureter in children. Pediatr’, 2013; 86 p. (in Russ.)
8. Ainakulov A.D., Majlybaev B.M. Differentiated approach to the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter in children. Detskaya hirurgiya, 2018; 18 (5): 16–18. (in Russ.)
9. Stanek I. Human embryology. «VEDA», Publishing House Of The Slovak Academy Of Sciences. Bratislava, 1977; 440 p.
10. Smirnov I.E., Shamov B.К., Sharkov S.М., Кucherenko A.G., Yatsyk S.P Biomarkers in early diagnosis of megaureter in children. Rossijskij pediatricheskij zhurnal, 2011; 3: 31–36. (in Russ.)
11. Ibodov H.I., Mirakov H.M. Diagnostics of urodynamic disorders in children with non-refluxing megaureter (literature review). Vestnik pedagogicheskogo universiteta (Estestvennyh nauk), 2022; 4 (16): 295–301. (in Russ.)
12. Vishnevskij E.L., Panin A.P., Ignat’ev R.O. Efficacy of biofeedback treatment for overactive bladder in children. Rossijskij vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii, 2010; 55 (2): 104–108. (in Russ.) Deryugina L.A. Vesicoureteral reflux and its prenatal prognosis. Pediatriya im. G.N. Speranskogo, 2018; 97 (5): 14–19. DOI: 10.24110/0031-403X2018-97-5-14-19. (in Russ.)
13. Astapenko A.V., Lihachev S.A., Zabrodec G.V. Neurogenic bladder: pathogenesis, classification, diagnosis, treatment. Belorusskij medicinskij zhurnal 2002; (1): 7–11. (in Russ.)
14. Kazanskaya I.V., Babanin I.L., Rostovskaya V.V., Matyushina K.M., Voroncov A.L. The effect of the herbal preparation «Rovatinex» on the urodynamics of the upper urinary tract and dysmetabolic processes in children with hydronephrosis and obstructive megaureter. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya urologiya, 2015; (4): 117–122. (in Russ.)
15. [Bataeva E.P., Zeleneva A.Yu. Vesicoureteral reflux in children — diagnostic issues. Zabajkal`skij medicinskij zhurnal, 2019; (3): 9–12 (in Russ.)
16. Gorshkova E.G., Krivich M.B. Cystatin C — an early marker of kidney function decline. Zdravoohranenie Dal’nego Vostoka, 2017; (4): 109–111. (in Russ.)
17. Mihaleva L.L., Zolotavina M.L., Hablyuk V.V. Cystatin C is a reliable biochemical indicator of impaired renal filtration function in children. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2012; (5): 24–28 (in Russ.)
18. Levitskaya M.V., Menovschikova L.B., Mokrushina O.G., Shumikhin V.S., Sklyarova T.A., Gurevich A.I. et. al. Late results of endoscopic correction the pathology of the ureter-vesical segment in infants. Rossijskij zhurnal detskoj hirurgii, anesteziologii i intensivnoj terapii, 2012; 2 (3): 41–50. (in Russ.)
19. Begun I.V., Papkevich I.I. Resistance index in diagnostics of kidney diseases — possibilities and limitations. Nefrologiya, 2009; 13 (4): 18–27. (in Russ.)
20. Deryugina L.A. Vesicoureteral reflux and its prenatal prognosis. Pediatriya im. G.N. Speranskogo, 2018; 97 (5): 14–19. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.24110/0031-403X2018-97-5-14-19.
21. Stolin A.R., Makarevich V.F., Ermolenko Yu.A. Radionuclide diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Novosti luchevoj diagnostiki, 1998; (3): 29–31. (in Russ.)
22. Gasanov D.A., Barskaya M.A., Terekhin S.S., Seregin A.S., Bastrakov A.N., Melkumova L.G. et. al. Causes and ways to preventing obstructive complications after endoplasty of the ureteral mouth in children. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2021; (6): 123. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.17513/spno.31277
23. Guseva N.B., Nikitin S.S., Ignatiev R.O., Mlinchik E.V. Principles of classification of bladder dysfunctions: the search for uniform criteria. Pediatriya im. G.N.Speransky, 2020; 99 (5): 271–275 (in Russ.)
24. Novikova E.V., Menovshhikova L.B., Prikuls V.F., Trunova O.V. The use of laser radiation and interference currents in the medical rehabilitation of children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Voprosy` kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoj fizicheskoj kul`tury`2020; 98 (4): 71–76, DOI: 10.38025/ 2078–1962– 2020–98–4–71–76. (in Russ.)
25. Malkoch A.V., Gavrilova V.A., Yurasova Yu.B. Pyelonephritis in children: classification, course, diagnosis and treatment. Lechashchij vrach, 2006; (7): 20–24. (in Russ.)
26. Nikitin S.S., Guseva N.B., Ukval’berg M.E. Neurourological examination and treatment of children operated on for spinal hernia. Pediatriya. Zhurnal im. G.N. Speranskogo, 2021; 100 (4): 116–122. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.24110/0031-403X-2021-100-4-116-122.
27. Barsegyan E.R., Zorkin S.N. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of various polymers in endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Detskaya hirurgiya, 2014; 18 (5): 4–8. (in Russ.)
28. Pirogov A.V., Sizonov V.V., Kogan M.I. Comparative efficacy and safety of transurethral and vesicoscopic surgery for primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. Vestnik urologii, 2020; 8: 58–68. (in Russ.)
29. Pirogov A.V., Sizonov V.V., Kogan M.I. Experience of 157 vesicoscopic operations in children. Urologiya, 2017; 6: 59–64. (in Russ.)
30. Ajnakulov A.D., Majlybaev B.M. Differentiated approach to the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter in children. Detskaya hirurgiya, 2014; 18 (5): 16–18. (in Russ.)
31. Sal’nikov V.Yu., Gubarev V.I., Zorkin S.N., Filinov I.V., Petrov E.I. Endoscopic high pressure balloon dilation as a treatment method for primary obstructive megaureter in children. Pediatriya. Zhurnal im. G.N. Speranskogo, 2016; 95 (5): 48–52. (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Nikitin S.S., Guseva N.B., Tyukina A.A. Causes of obstructive uropathy in children, inflammatory and neurogenic disorders of urine outflow. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2025;70(3):26-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2025-70-3-26-35