Preview

Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics)

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Difficulties in the differential diagnosis of Angelman’s syndrome

https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2022-67-6-113-122

Abstract

Angelman syndrome is a rare neurogenetic disease caused by the loss of the function of the maternal allele of the UBE3A gene on chromosome 15 (site 15q11.2–q13) and is characterized by severe mental retardation, lack of speech, epilepsy, microcephaly and a characteristic facial phenotype with a unique behavior in the form of frequent laughter. The combination of microcephaly, epilepsy, speechlessness and mental retardation poses a problem for differential diagnosis with many genetic diseases presenting with similar symptoms. Epileptic encephalopathy due to CDKL5 gene mutation and Rett syndrome have the greatest similarity. The hallmark of Angelman syndrome are laughter attacks and specific EEG changes. The authors have presented a table of the differential diagnosis of Angelman syndrome with some phenotypically similar genetic syndromes, indicating the most significant distinguishing features, which should facilitate for the pediatrician and neurologist the diagnostic path of establishing the correct diagnosis.

About the Authors

Z. K. Gorchkhanova
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. A. Nikolaeva
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



A. M. Pivovarova
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



S. V. Bochenkov
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. D. Belousova
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Debopam S. Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: A scoping review. Brain Dev 2021; 43(1): 32–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2020.08.014

2. Williams C.A., Beauder A.L., Clayton-Smith J., Knoll J.H., Kyllerman M., Laan L.A. et al. Angelman syndrome 2005: consensus for diagnostic criteria. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140(5): 413–418. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31074

3. Robinson A.A., Goldman S., Barnes G., Goodpaster L., Malow B.A. Electroencephalogram (EEG) duration needed to detect abnormalities in angelman syndrome: is 1 hour of overnight recording sufficient? J Child Neurol 2015; 30: 58–62. DOI: 10.1177/0883073814530498

4. Leyser M., Penna P.S., de Almeida A.C., Vasconcelos M.M., Nascimento O.J. Revisiting epilepsy and the electroencephalogram patterns in Angelman syndrome. Neurol Sci 2014; 35: 701–705. DOI: 10.1007/s10072–013–1586–3

5. Bird L.M. Angelman syndrome: review of clinical and molecular aspects. Appl Clin Genet 2014; 7: 93–104. DOI: 10.2147/TACG.S57386

6. Bahi-Buisson N., Bienvenu T. CDKL5-related disorders: from clinical description to molecular genetics. Mol Syndromol 2012; 2(3–5): 137–152. DOI: 000331333

7. Bahi-Buisson N., Villeneuve N., Caietta E., Jacquette A., Maurey H., MatthÜs G. et al. Recurrent mutations in the CDKL5gene: genotype-phenotype relationships. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158A(7): 1612–1619. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35401

8. Fehr S., Wilson M., Downs J., Williams S., Murgia A. The CDKL5 disorder is an independent clinical entity associated with early-onset encephalopathy. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21(3): 266–273. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.156

9. Jakimiec M., Paprocka J., Smigiel R. CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder-A Complex Epileptic Encephalopathy. Brain Sciences 2020; 10(2): 107. DOI: org/10.3390/brainsci10020107

10. Adegbola A.A., Gonzales M.L., Chess A., LaSalle J.M., Cox G.F. A novel hypomorphic MECP2 point mutation is associated with a neuropsychiatric phenotype. Hum Genet 2009; 124: 615–623. DOI: 10.1007/s00439–008–0585–6

11. Hagberg B. Clinical manifestations and stages of Rett syndrome. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2002; 8: 61–65. DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.10020

12. Ramocki M.B., Tavyev Y.J., Peters S.U. The MECP2 Duplication Syndrome Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A(5): 1079–1088. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33184

13. El Chehadeh S., Touraine R., Prieur F., Reardon W., Bienvenu T., Chantot-Bastaraud S. et al. Xq28 duplication including MECP2 in six unreported affected females: what can we learn for diagnosis and genetic counselling? Clin Genet 2017; 91(4): 576–588. DOI: 10.1111/cge.12898

14. Zollino M., Zweier C., Van Balkom I.D., Sweetser D.A., Alaimo J., BÜlsma E.K. et al. Genet Diagnosis and management in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: First international consensus statement. Clin Genet 2019; 95(4): 462–478. DOI: 10.1111/cge.13506

15. Evans E., Einfeld S., Mowat D., Taffe J., Tonge B., Wilson M. The behavioral phenotype of Mowat– Wilson syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A 2012; 158A: 358–366. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34405

16. Ivanovski I., Djuric O., Caraffi S.G., Santodirocco D., Pollazzon M., Rosato S. et al. Phenotype and genotype of 87 patients with Mowat–Wilson syndrome and recommendations for care. Genet Med 2018; 20: 965–975. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.221

17. Koolen D.A., Kramer J.M., Neveling K., Nillesen W.M., Moore-Barton H.L., Elmslie F.V. et al. Mutations in the chromatin modifier gene KANSL1 cause the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. Nat Genet 2012; 44(6): 639–641. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2262

18. Clayton-Smith J., Webb T., Cheng X.J., Pembrey M.E., Malcolm S. Duplication of chromosome 15 in the region 15q11– 13 in a patient with developmental delay and ataxia with similarities to Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet 1993; 30: 529–531. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.30.6.529

19. Frohlich J., Senturk D., Saravanapandian V., Golshani P., Reiter L.T., Sankar R. et al. A Quantitative Electrophysiological Biomarker of Duplication 15q11.2–q13.1 Syndrome. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12): e0167179. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167179

20. D’Onofrio G., Riva A., Di Rosa G., Cali’ E., Efthymiou S., Gitto E. et al. Paroxysmal limb dystonias associated with GABBR2 pathogenic variant: A case-based literature review. Brain Dev 2022; 44(7): 469–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2022.03.010

21. Stewart D.R., Kleefstra T. The chromosome 9q subtelomere deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007; 145(4): 383–392. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30148

22. Kleefstra T., Leeuw N. Kleefstra Syndrome. In: M.P. Adam, G.M. Mirzaa, R.A. Pagon, S.E. Wallace, L. Bean, K.W. Gripp, A. Amemiya (eds). GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47079 / Ссылка актив-на на 11.10.2022.

23. Morrow E.M., Pescosolido M.F. Christianson Syndrome. In: M.P. Adam, G.M. Mirzaa, R.A. Pagon, S.E. Wallace, L. Bean, K.W. Gripp, A. Amemiya (eds). GeneReviews® [Inter-net]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475801 / Ссылка активна на 11.10.2022.

24. Rinaldi B., Villa R., Sironi A., Garavelli L., Finelli P., Bedeschi M.F. Smith-Magenis Syndrome — Clinical Review, Biological Background and Related Disorders. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13(2): 335. DOI: 10.3390/genes13020335

25. Goldman A.M., Potocki L., Walz K., Lynch J.K., Glaze D.G., Lupski J.R., Noebels J.L. Epilepsy and chromosomal rearrangements in Smith–Magenis Syndrome [del(17) (p11.2p11.2)]. J Child Neurol 2006; 21(2): 93–98. DOI: 10.1177/08830738060210021201


Review

For citations:


Gorchkhanova Z.K., Nikolaeva E.A., Pivovarova A.M., Bochenkov S.V., Belousova E.D. Difficulties in the differential diagnosis of Angelman’s syndrome. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2022;67(6):113-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2022-67-6-113-122

Views: 504


ISSN 1027-4065 (Print)
ISSN 2500-2228 (Online)