

Etiological structure of sepsis in extremely premature infants
https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2025-70-3-36-40
Abstract
Despite significant advances in modern neonatology, neonatal sepsis remains the main factor in mortality, severe complications, and disability in children. The success of treatment of such children largely depends on timely and adequate antibacterial therapy based on knowledge of the etiology of the disease.
Objective. To determine the features of the modern etiological structure of sepsis in extremely premature infants to improve the effectiveness of their treatment.
Material and methods. The study of the etiology of sepsis was carried out in 24 premature infants with a birth weight of 980 to 1490 g and a gestational age of 26 to 31 weeks. Sowing of biological material (blood, feces and discharge from foci of infection), as well as determination of the sensitivity of pathogens to antibiotics were carried out using generally accepted methods.
Results. Blood cultures were positive in the vast majority of infants. Blood cultures predominantly yielded gram-positive cocci (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, group B Streptococcus), less commonly gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Neisseria meningitidis), Candida albicans, and intracellular microorganisms: Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Chlamidia trachomatis. Most infants had monoinfection. Blood culture associations were detected as combinations of bacteria and/or intracellular microorganisms. Local foci of infection predominantly yielded the same microorganisms as those found in the blood. Most strains of bacterial pathogens were multiresistant to antibiotics.
Conclusion. The etiology of sepsis in extremely premature infants is represented by a wide range of microorganisms with a predominance of gram-positive bacteria and pathogens of intrauterine infection — intracellular pathogens. Blood and biomaterial cultures from infection foci to isolate pathogens causing neonatal sepsis will help determine the choice of antibacterial therapy at all stages of treatment, especially when prescribed early.
About the Authors
M. V. KushnarevaRussian Federation
125412, Moscow
N. M. Karakhan
Russian Federation
125412, Moscow
References
1. Raturi A., Chandran S. Neonatal Sepsis: Aetiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Advances and Management Strategies. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2024; 18: 11795565241281337. DOI: 10.1177/11795565241281337
2. Weitkamp J.-H. The Role of Biomarkers in Suspected Neonatal Sepsis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 73 (2): e391– e393. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa869
3. Beaumont R., Tang K., Gwee A. The Sensitivity and Specificity of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Bacterial Sepsis in Neonates. Hosp Pediatr. 2024; 14 (3): 199–208. DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007318
4. Maddaloni C., De Rose D.U., Santisi A., Martini L., Bersani S.C.I., Ronchetti M.P., et. al. The Emerging Role of Presepsin (P-SEP) in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in the Critically Ill Infant: A Literature Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22 (22): 12154. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212154
5. On the unification of microbiological (bacteriological) research methods used in clinical diagnostic laboratories of medical treatment — andprophylactic institutions. Order № 535 from 22.04.1985 of the Ministry of health of the USSR. Moscow, 1985; 126 p. (in Russ.) URL: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293724/4293724368.htm?ysclid=m6cjcsehlp227579713 / Ссылка активна на 8.04.2025
6. Bondarenko V.M., Likhoded V.G. Microbiological diagnostics of intestinal dysbiosis: methodological recommendations. N.F. Gamaleya Federal Research Center for Epidemiology & Microbiology; Moscow, 2007; 66. (in Russ.). URL: http://www.himedialabs.ru/literat
7. Zarucheynova O.V. Methods of laboratory diagnosis of urogenital infections associated with Mycopladma hominis and Ureaplasma spp.. Infectsiya i immunitet. 2014; 4 (4): 331–338 (in Russ.)] DOI: 10.15789/2220-7619-2014-4-331-338
8. The definition of sensitivity of microorganisms to antibacterial preparations. Methodical instructions. МUК 4.2.1890–04. Approved March 4, 2004. 91 p. (in Russ.). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/12000385836м / Ссылка активна на 8.04.2025
9. Ying D., Romain B., Titomanlio L., Sun B., Jean-Christophe Mercier J-C. Neonatal sepsis: within and beyond China. Chinese Medical Journal. 2020; 133 (18): 2219–2228. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000935
10. Serbis A. Intensive Care Units: Rational Use of Antibiotics in Neonatal Sepsis. Antibiotics. 2023; 12 (3): 508. DOI: 10.31729/jnma.7324
11. De Castro Romanelli R.M., Anchieta L.M., Silva A.C.B.E., de Jesus L.A., Rosado V., Clemente W.T. Empirical antimicrobial therapy for late-onset sepsis in a neonatal unit with high prevalence of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016: 92 (5): 472–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.01.008
12. Flannery D.D., Puopolo K.M. Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis. Neoreviews. 2022; 23 (11): 756–770. DOI: 10.1542/neo.23-10-e756
13. Janjindamai W., Phetpisal S. Time to positivity of blood culture in newborn infants. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006; 37: 171–176. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000018
14. Bethou A., Bhat V.B.B. Sepsis—Newer Insights. Indian J Pediatr. 2022; 89 (3): 267–273. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-021-03852-z
15. Ramineni P., Kamath S.P., Manjrekar P., Kamath P., Mithra P., Kulkarni V. Serum calprotectin as a marker of neonatal sepsis: a hospital-based cross-sectional diagnostic study. F1000Res. 2023; 12: 626. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.132099.1
Review
For citations:
Kushnareva M.V., Karakhan N.M. Etiological structure of sepsis in extremely premature infants. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2025;70(3):36-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2025-70-3-36-40