Preview

Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics)

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hereditary diseases

https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2026-71-3-7-15

Abstract

Diagnostics of rare diseases presents significant challenges for both physicians and developers of artificial intelligence systems. This is due to the genotypic and phenotypic polymorphism of fuzzy clinical manifestations. Previously created computer systems did not include or insufficiently analyzed visual images of patients. The use of neural network technologies in phenotype analysis for disease recognition does not explain the proposed solution and their application is impossible on small samples of rare diseases. At the same time, a delay in nosological identification of diseases leads to the appearance of irreversible pathological changes that could be prevented with the timely appointment of pathogenetic therapy, which has recently appeared for a number of hereditary diseases. A version of the construction of a diagnostic system for rare diseases is presented, including visual image rows, accompanied by an explanation understandable to the physician. The peculiarities of constructing an expert system for differential diagnosis of hereditary diseases, implemented for lysosomal storage diseases, are indicated. A quantitative comprehensive assessment of the symptoms used in the diagnostic intelligent system is implemented based on expert confidence factors. The integrated approach includes measures of confidence in modality (diagnostic significance of a symptom), manifestation during a certain period of life, and severity. Options for constructing systems with user participation at the stage of evaluating the hypotheses put forward are considered. A prototype of a hybrid intelligent system implemented on the model of progressive Duchenne muscular dystrophy includes a module for analyzing precedents representing atypical variants of a rare disease. The development of systems for diagnostics of rare diseases can be implemented within the framework of a hybrid intelligent system built on the basis of a logical-linguistic-image paradigm in combination with decision-making based on precedents. The combination of symbolic systems on knowledge with subsymbolic ones based on neural network technologies will provide the possibility of joint decision-making using verbal and image components and providing users with meaningful explanations of the hypotheses put forward, taking into account the physician’s specialization.

About the Author

B. A. Kobrinskii
Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

119333, Moscow



References

1. Zakharova E.Yu., Baidakova G.V., Mikhailova S.V., Pchelina S.N., Krasnopolskaya K.D. Lysosomal storage diseases: a guide for doctors. Moscow; GEOTAR-Media, 2021; 424. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.33029/9704-6321-5-LAD-2021-1-424

2. Tinker J., Fisher M., Gimeno A.F., Gill K., Ivey C., Peterson J.F., Bastarache L. Diagnostic delay in monogenic disease: A scoping review. Genet Med 2024; 26(4):101074. DOI: 10.1016/J.GIM.2024.101074.

3. Gouvernet J., Caraboenf M., Ayme S. GENDIAG: A computer assisted facility in medical genetics based on belief functions. Meth Inform Med 1985;24(4):177-180.

4. Kobrinskii B.A., Kazantseva L.Z., Feldman A.E. Automated systems for differential diagnostics of hereditary diseases. Hereditary pathology of man. Editors Yu.E. Veltischev and N.P. Bochkov. Vol. II. Moscow, 1992; 229-239. (in Russ.)

5. Fryer A. POSSUM (Pictures of Standard Syndromes and Undiagnosed Malformations). J Med Genet 1991;28 (1):66-67. 6. Baraitser M., Winter R.M. London dysmorphology database, London neurogenetics database & dysmorphology photo library on CD-ROM. 3rd ed. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2001.

6. Allanson J.E., Cunniff C., Hoyme H.E., McGaughran J., Muenke M., Neri G. Elements of morphology: Standard terminology for the head and face. Am J Med Genet Part A 2009;149A:6-28. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32612

7. Alves R., Piñol M., Vilaplana J., Teixidó I., Corella J.C., Comas J. et al. Computer-assisted initial diagnosis of rare diseases. Peer J 2016;4:e2211. DOI:10.7717/peerj.2211

8. Ronicke S., Hirsch M.C., Türk E., Larionov K., Tientcheu D., Wagner A.D. Can a decision support system accelerate rare disease diagnosis? Evaluating the potential impact of Ada DX in a retrospective study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2019;14(1): 69. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1040-6

9. Kobrinskii B.A., Blagosklonov N.A. Artificial intelligence system for diagnosing rare diseases: Design principles and clinical validation results. Sibirskij zhurnal klinicheskoj i eksperimental’noj mediciny 2025;40(2):218-225. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.29001/2073-8552-2025-2706

10. Negro P., Pons C. Artificial Intelligence techniques based on the integration of symbolic logic and deep neural networks: A systematic review of the literature. Inteligencia Artif. 2022;25(69):13-41. DOI: 10.4114/intartif.vol25iss69pp13-41

11. Kobrinskii B.A. Certainty Factor Trinity in Medical Diagnostics. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinyatie reshenij. 2018; 2: 62-72. DOI: 10.14357/20718594180205

12. Blagosklonov N.A., Kobrinskii B.A. Diagnostic decision making in expert system in conditions of incomplete or redundancy data. Integrated Models and Soft Computing in Artificial Intelligence: Collection of scientific papers of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference. Smolensk: Universum, 2024; 1: 55-63. (in Russ.)

13. Hallgrímsson B., Aponte J.D., Katz D.C., et al. Automated syndrome diagnosis by three-dimensional facial imaging. Genet Med. 2020;22(10):1682–1693. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0845-y

14. Kobrinskii B.A. The significance of visual-image presentations for medical intelligent systems. Sci Tech Inf Process 2013;40(6): 337-341. DOI: 10.3103/S014768821306004X

15. Kobrinskii B.A., Nikolaev A.A., Vlodavets D.V. Hybrid Intelligent Medical System with Decision-Making Process Modification. Proceedings of the Ninth International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry”. 2026; 1: 329-337. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-13612-1_29

16. Ennab M., Mcheick H. Enhancing interpretability and accuracy of AI models in healthcare: a comprehensive review on challenges and future directions. Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1444763. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1444763

17. Ehsan U., Riedl M.O. Social construction of XAI: Do we need one definition to rule them all? Patterns 2024; 5:100926. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100926

18. Calegari R., Ciatto G., Mascardi V., Omicini A. Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst. 2021; 35: 1. DOI: 10.1007/S10458-020-09478-3

19. Phillips P.J., Hahn C.A., Fontana P.C., Yates A.N., Greene K., Broniatowski D.A. et al. Four principles of explainable artificial intelligence. National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency or Internal Report. 2021: 43. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8312-draft

20. Shukla P., Bui P., Levy S.S., Kowalski M., Baigelenov A., Parsons P. De-skilling, Cognitive Offloading, and Misplaced Responsibilities: Potential Ironies of AI-Assisted Design. arXiv. 2025; 2503.03924. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.03924


Review

For citations:


Kobrinskii B.A. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hereditary diseases. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2026;71(3):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2026-71-3-7-15

Views: 44

JATS XML

ISSN 1027-4065 (Print)
ISSN 2500-2228 (Online)