The clinical and prognostic significance of the method for analyzing neuromuscular characteristics of movements in very preterm infants
https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2026-71-4-117-125
Abstract
Human motor functions are formed as a result of a dynamic interaction between the developing nervous system and the musculoskeletal system, the transition from spontaneous fetal movements to the control of upright posture and the development of locomotion. Careful analysis of these motor patterns in early ontogenesis can provide insight into the functional integrity of spinal and supraspinal networks and identify early developmental deviations in high-risk groups, such as preterm infants. The method of quantitative muscle activity analysis, based on the recording of electromyographic and kinematic parameters during spontaneous and passive limb movements, allows for an objective assessment of motor variability, inter-limb coordination, and neuromuscular activation. Using this method, we previously obtained quantitative characteristics and features of muscle reaction formation in term and preterm infants. In the present study, the capabilities of this method are illustrated through an individual clinical observation of a very preterm infant. Despite unfavorable initial clinical prerequisites – extremely low birth weight, pronounced morpho-functional immaturity, signs of periventricular leukomalacia on cranial ultrasound, and very slow motor skill acquisition significantly lagging behind corrected age norms–the application of an objective neurophysiological approach allowed for the prediction and tracking of positive dynamics and subsequent favorable development of motor functions. Thus, quantitative neurophysiological analysis of muscle activity enables an objective assessment of sensorimotor circuit maturation and holds clinical and prognostic significance.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. S. KeshishyanRussian Federation
117513, Moscow
I. A. Solopova
Russian Federation
127051, Moscow
V. A. Selionov
Russian Federation
127051, Moscow
I. Yu. Dolinskaya
Russian Federation
127051, Moscow
E. S. Sakharova
Russian Federation
117513, Moscow
References
1. Volodin N.N., Keshishyan E.S., Pankratjeva L.L., Mostovoy A.V., Ovsjannikov D.Y., Karpova A.L., et al. Strategies of Russian Neonatology: Challen ges of the Present and a Look into the Future. Pediatria named after G.N. Speransky. 2022; 101(1): 8-20. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.24110/0031-403X-2022-101-1-8-20.
2. Keshishyan E.S., Belyeva I.A., Petrova A.S., Fedorova L.A., Ledjakina L.V., Malutina L.V., et al. Establishing a System o f Dynamic Follow-Up for Preterm Children as a Key Strateg y to Reduce Disability and Improve Their Quality of Life. Pediatria named after G.N. Speransky. 2023;102(1):12-17. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.24110/0031-403X-2023-102-1-12-17.
3. Batisheva T.T., Krapivkin A.I., Tsaregorodtsev A.D., Sukhorukov V.S., Tikhonov S.V. Rehabilitation of Children with Central Nervous System Disorders/Injuries. Rossijskij vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii. 2017;62(6):7-15. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2017-62-6-7-15.
4. Sakharova E.S., Keshishuan E.S., Aliamovskaya G.A. Preterm Birth as a Medical and Social Publ ic Health Issue. Rossijskij vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii. 2017; 62(3):15–19. DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2017-62-3-15-19.
5. Solopova I.A., Zhvansky D.S., Dolinskaya I.Y., Keshishian E.S., Selionov V.A., Sylos-Labini F., et al. Muscle responses to passive joint movements in infants during the first year of life. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1158. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01158
6. Solopova I.A., Selionov V.A., Dolinskaj I.U., Keshishyan E.S. General Movements as a Factor of the Normal or Impaired Infants Motor Development. Human Physiology. 2020;46(4):98-110. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S0131164620040128.
7. da Silva E.S. Nunes M.L. The influence of gestational age and birth weight in the clinical assessment of the muscle tone of healthy term and preterm newborns. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2005; 63: 956–962. DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2005000600010
8. Ivanenko Y.P., Gurfinkel V.S. Human postural control. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:171. DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.00171.
9. Selionov V.A., Solopova I.A., Zhvansky D.S., Karabanov A.V., Chernikova L.A., Gurfinkel V.S., et al. Lack of non-voluntary stepping responses in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2013;3:235:96-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.064
10. Ivanenko Y.P., Dominici N., Cappellini G, Di Paolo A., Giannini C., Poppele R.E., et al. Changes in the spinal segmental motor output for stepping during development from infant to adult. J Neurosci. 2013;13;33(7):3025-36a. DOI: 10.1523/jNEUROSCI.2722-12.2013
11. Martin J.H. The corticospinal system: from development to motor control. Neuroscientist. 2005;11:161–173. DOI:10.1177/1073858404270843.
12. de Graaf-Peters V.B., Hadders-Algra M. Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: what is happening when? Early Hum Dev. 2006; 82(4):257-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.013.
13. Ivanenko Y. Gurfinkel V.S. Human Postural Control. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12: 171. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00171.
14. Dolinskaya I.Y., Solopova I.A., Zhvansky D.S., Keshishian E.S., Ivanenko Y. Increasing muscle activity correlations during spontaneous movements in the first six months of life. Neurosci Lett. 2021;756:135957. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135957.
15. Dolinskaya I.Y., Solopova I.A., Zhvansky D.S., Rubeca D., Sylos-Labini F., Lacquaniti F., et al. Muscle Activity during Passive and Active Movements in Preterm and Full-Term Infants. Biology. 2023;12:724. DOI: 10.3390/biology12050724.
16. Zhvansky E.S., Tsyshkova O.N., Grishin A.A., Ivanenko Y.P., Levik Y.S., Keshishian E.S. Characteristics of EMG activity in infants with movement disorders. Human Physiology. 2015;41(1):39-46 DOI: 10.1134/SO362119715010156.
17. Cacciatore T.W., Mian O.S., Peters A., Day B.L. Neuromechanical interference of posture on movement: evidence from Alexander technique teachers rising from a chair. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112:719–729. DOI:10.1152/jn.00617.2013.
18. Luhmann H.J., Sinning A., Yang J.-W., Reyes-Puerta V., Stüttgen M.C., Kirischuk S., et al. Spontaneous neuronal activity in developing neocortical networks: from single cells to large-scale interactions. Front Neural Circuits. 2016;10:40. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00040.
19. Prechtl H.F., Einspieler C. The qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(3):198–201. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00092-3.
20. Hadders-Algra M. Development of postural control during the first 18 months of life. Neural Plast. 2005;12(2–3):99–108. DOI:10.1155/NP.2005.99.
21. Hadders-Algra M. Neural substrate and clinical significance of general movements: an update. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:39–46. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13540.
Review
For citations:
Keshishyan E.S., Solopova I.A., Selionov V.A., Dolinskaya I.Yu., Sakharova E.S. The clinical and prognostic significance of the method for analyzing neuromuscular characteristics of movements in very preterm infants. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2026;71(4):117‑125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2026-71-4-117-125
JATS XML






































