Survival trends for very low and extremely low birth weight infants in the Voronezh Region in 2008 to 2012
Abstract
The 2008—2012 survival trends were analyzed in very low and extremely low birth weight in the Voronezh Region. The official statistical data of Form No. 32 of the Federal State Statistics Service for Obstetric Facilities in the Voronezh Region and its registry office data on consecutive registration of medical death certificates were examined. In 2008 to 2012, the Voronezh Region showed reduced antenatal losses in the group of very low and extremely low birth weight infants. By 2012, along with an increasing number of live births in a group of extremely low birth weight birth infants, the survival up to 1 year doubled and amounted to as high as 43,4%. That was 92,5% in a group of very low birth weight infants. No deaths were notified among the very low and extremely low birth weight babies after primary hospital discharge. The results of the performed studies suggest that the region exhibited the improved quality of care during pregnancy and labor and care to the newborns in the early neonatal period and the increased levels of nursing care for low birth weight infants during the first months of life.
About the Authors
I. V. VoroninaRussian Federation
A. F. Neretina
Russian Federation
I. N. Popova
Russian Federation
References
1. Демьянова Т.Г., Гршоръянц Л.Я., Авдеева Т.Г. Наблюдение за глубоко недоношенными детьми первого года жизни. М: Медпрактика-М 2006; 148. (DemyanovaT.G., Grigoryants L.Y., Avdeeva T.G., Follow-up of ELWB infant during the first year of their life. Moscow: Medpractika-M 2006; 148.)
2. Петрова А.С., Захарова Н.И., Нароган M.B. Эффективность современных принципов реанимационной и интенсивной помощи недоношенным с экстремально низкой и очень низкой массой тела. Рос вестн перина-тол и педиат 2012; 1: 25—28. (Petrova A.S., ZakharovaN.L, Narogan M.V., Efficiency of current principles of resuscitation and intensive care to extremely low and very low birth weight premature infants. Ros Vestn Perinatal i Pediat 2012; 1: 25-28.)
3. Lisonkova S., Sabr Y, Butler B. International comparisons of preterm birth: higher rates of late preterm birth are associated with lower rates of stillbirth and neonatal death. Intern J Obstetr Gynaecol 2012; DOI: lO.llll/j.1471-0528.2012.03403.x: 1630-1639.
4. Zeitlin J., Szamotulska K., Drewniak N. et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 coutries. 2013; DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12281:1356-1365.
5. Заугстад О.Д. Недоношенный ребенок. М: ГЕОТАР-медиа 2012; 190. (Ola DidrikSaugstadA Premature Baby. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media2012; 190.)
6. Larroque В., Ancel PY, Marret S. et al. Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): alongitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2008; 371: 813-820.
7. Martin J.A., Osterman M.J.K. Preterm Births — United States, 2006 and 2010. Morbidity and mortality Weekly Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013; 62: 3: 136-138.
8. Суханова Л.П. Исходы беременности и перинатальные потери при новых критериях рождения (По данным анализа статистических форм №№13, 14, 32). Электронный научный журнал «Социальные аспекты здоровья населения» 2013; 3: http://vestnik.mednet.ru. (Sukhanova L.P. Outcome of pregnancy and perinatal loses at new criteria of birth (According to the analysis of the №№ 13, 14, 32 statistical forms)). Electronic scientific journal Sotsial'nye aspe-kty zdorov'ya naseleniya 2013; 3:http:// vestnik.mednet.ru.
9. Особенности оказания медицинской помощи детям, родившимся в сроках гестации 22—27 нед. Под ред. Д.О. Иванова, Д.Н. Суркова. СПб.: Информнавигатор 2013; 131. (Characteristics of medical care of infants born at 22—27 weeks of gestation. D.O. Ivanov, D.N. Surkov (eds.). St-Petersburg: Informnavigator2013; 131.)
10. Неонатология. Национальное руководство. Под ред. Н.Н.Володина. М.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа, 2008; 749. (Neonatology. National guideline. N.N. Volodin (ed.).Moscow: GEOTAR-Media2009; 749.)
11. Тамазян Г.В., Захарова Н.И., Гридчик А.Л. Перинатальная и младенческая смертность в Московской области. М 2010; 75. (Tamazyan G.V., Zakharova N.I. GridtchikA.L. Perinatal and infant mortality in Moskow region. Moscow: 2010; 75.)
12. Суханова Л.П., Кузнецова Т.В. Перинатальные проблемы воспроизводства населения России (По данным анализа статистических форм № № 13, 32). Электронный научный журнал «Социальные аспекты здоровья населения» 2010; 4: http://vestnik.mednet.ru (Sukhanova L.P., KuznetsovaT.V. Perinatal problems of reproduction of the population of Russia (according to the analysis of the №№13, 32 statistical forms). Electronic scientific journal Sotsial'nye aspekty zdorov'ya nas-eleniya 2010; 4: http:// vestnik.mednet.ru.
13. Байбарина Е.Н., Дегтярев Д. Н. Перинатальная медицина: от теории к практике. Рос вестн перинатол и педиат 2013;
14. : 4—7. (Baibarina E.N., Degtaryev D.N. Perinatal medicine: from theory to practice. Ros Vestn Perinatal I Pediat 2013; 5: 4-7.)
15. Kalimba E.M., Ballot D.E. Survival of extremely low-birth— weigth Infants. SA J Child Health 2013; 7: 1: 13-16.
16. Kusuda S., Fujimura M., Sakuma I. et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Infants with Very Low Birth Weigth in Japan: Center Variation. Pediatrics 2006; 18: 1130-1138.
17. Ogawa M., Matsuda Y., Kanda E. et al. Survival Rates of Extremely Low Birth Weigth Infants and Its Risk Factors: Case-Control Study in Japan. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2013: 873563. doi: 10.1155/2013/873563.
18. Itabashi K, Horiuchi Т., Kusuda S. Mortality Rates for Extremely Low Birth Weigth Infants Born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 2: 445-450.
Review
For citations:
Voronina I.V., Neretina A.F., Popova I.N. Survival trends for very low and extremely low birth weight infants in the Voronezh Region in 2008 to 2012. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2015;60(1):27-31. (In Russ.)