Results of a multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of the liquid form of Anaferon for children in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are major causes of morbidity in children. Symptomatic treatment is insufficiently effective and requires additional drugs with etiotropic action. This multi-center double blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical study with superiority model design considers a liquid formulation of Anaferon for children.

Methods. The study included 142 children from 1 month to 3 years 11 month 29 days old with ARI of the upper respiratory tract. They were randomized into Anaferon for children and Placebo groups (71 in each group) via interactive voice randomization system. The treatment period was 5 days, observation period – 14 days. The average duration of the symptoms and the severity of the respiratory disease were used as primary efficacy endpoints.

Results. All 142 patients were randomized and included into ITT (Intention to treat) analysis. 140 patients (70 patients in each group) were included into PP-analysis. The patients in the Anaferon for children group had better results with average duration of ARI as compared to the Placebo group (87.7±31.5h vs. 103.3±19.4h; p =0.007). The authors marked efficacy of Anaferon for children in such parameters as disease severity (ITT-analysis: p=0.0004), total severity of disease symptoms (ITT-analysis: ANOVA: “Group” factor p=0.0004; “Day” factor p<0.0001), and percentage of recovered patients (Log-rank test, p=0.035). There were no discrepancies between the groups in concomitant therapy (ITT-analysis: ANOVA “Group-Day” factor p=0.88), bacterial complications frequency (p=1.0), adverse effects (Fisher criteria: p=0.5321). The authors registered 14 cases of adverse events (10 cases in Anaferon group and 4 cases in Placebo group) in 11 patients. None of the adverse events had a certain or probable relation to the studied drug.

Conclusion. Anaferon for children proved their efficiency and safety in young children with ARI. 

1. Infectious disease. National guideline. N. Yushchuk, Yu. Vengerov (eds). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2009; 1058. (in Russ).

2. Clinical guidelines «Acute respiratory diseases (ARI) in children. Moscow: Union of pediatricians of Russia, 2018. (in Russ). https://www.pediatr-russia.ru/sites/default/files/file/kr_orvi2018.pdf

3. Pediatrics. National guideline. A.A. Baranov (ed.). Moscow: GEOTARMedia, 2009; 2; 1024. (in Russ).

4. Tatochenko V.K. Respiratory Diseases in children: a practical guide. Moscow: Pediatr, 2012; 280. (in Russ).

5. Fahey T., Stocks N., Thomas T. Systematic review of the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. Arch Dis Child 1998; 79(3): 225–230.

6. Ershov F.I., Kiselev O.I. Interferons and their inductors. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2005; 356. (in Russ).

7. Kanner E.V., Gorelov A.V. Mixed acute respiratory infections in children. Epidemiologia i infekcionnye bolezni. Actual’nye voprosy 2017; 3: 72–77. (in Russ).

8. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children, 4th list. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/4th_EMLc_FINAL_web_8Jul13.pdf. Published April, 2013. Accessed January 12, 2018.

9. Epstein O. The spatial homeostasis hypothesis. Symmetry. 2018; 10(4): 103. DOI:10.3390/sym10040103

10. Epstein O.I. The Phenomenon of release activity and the hypothesis of «spatial» homeostasis. Uspekhi fiziologicheskih nauk 2013; 44(3): 54–76. (in Russ).

11. Лобзин Ю.В., Де Роза Ф., Эсауленко Е.В. Отечественные и зарубежные исследования анаферона детского: эффективность, безопасность и опыт применения (обзор литературы). Журнал инфектологии. 2015; 7(4): 23-31.

12. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group. Stat Med 1999; 18(15): 1905–1942.

13. Ranganathan P., Pramesh C.S., Aggarwal R. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis Perspect Clin Res 2016; 7(3): 144–146. DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.184823