- » Aim and Scope
- » Section Policies
- » Publication Frequency
- » Archiving
- » Peer-Review
- » Indexation
- » Publishing Ethics
- » Founder
- » Publication Fee
- » Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
- » Plagiarism detection
- » Appeal
- » Preprint and postprint Policy
Aim and Scope
The most important tasks of the magazine are: coverage of modern trends of diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases in different areas of medicine.
The basic concept of the journal suggests the presentation of scientific researches and clinical observations results, consideration of the drug and non-drug treatment effectiveness as well as new laboratory diagnostic methods of children diseases, review of domestic and foreign achievements in the field of paediatrics. We publish debatable submissions, information for pediatricians about the results of Russian and international scientific forums, historical reviews in the field of pediatrics.
The journal promotes the professional development of scientific and medical staff, their familiarization with the latest achievements of medical science, and pediatric practice. Since the foundation and up to date we strive to maintain the main ideological direction - to become a center of advanced scientific thought in the field of maternal and child health.
Section Policies
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Publication Frequency
6 issues per year
Archiving
- Russian State Library (RSL)
- National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)
Peer-Review
All articles submitted to the journal office are peer reviewed by the members of the Editorial Board or invited experts. Peer review assists the editorial board in making editorial decisions. The number of reviews of each article is not limited. If the editor can see that the article has significant shortcomings that are not marked by a reviewer or he/she becomes aware of a conflict of interest or unethical behavior of the author or the reviewer and then sends the article to be re-reviewed. The journal 's Editorial Board makes a final decision on the publication of the article.
The review process is blind when the reviewers know who the author is, but the author does not know who the reviewer is.
By giving a reference to the article, the reviewer should:
- indicate whether the article is compliant with the journal's themes;
- evaluate the scientific level of the work:
- what original results this article contains;
- whether there are erroneous statements in the article;
- whether the reviewer assures himself/herself that this article is useful and relevant;
- whether the references to other authors' works, which can correctly determine the place of this article among other publications, are given,;
- assess the quality of article presentation:
- whether the title and abstract of the article correctly reflect its main content;
- whether the introduction formulates the object of an investigation;/li>
- whether the conclusion formulates the main conclusions of the article;
- whether any amendments to the text are needed;
- make one of the following conclusions on the work as a whole:
- the article may be published in the journal;
- the article can be published after the author finalizes its text;
- the article should be radically revised and considered for publication after peer re-review.
A negative review is made on a separate sheet of paper to be sent to the authors.
Based on the peer review of the article, the editors make one of the following decisions:
- to publish the article in the journal;
- to return the article to the authors to its finalization;
- to reject to publish the article.
In the article submitted for publication is rejected, it may be again accepted after its futher radical processing.
Effectiveness
Any peer reviewer appointed to assess the manuscript, who considers that his/her skills are not sufficient to make a decision in reviewing the article submitted or knows that its consideration will be delayed for one reason or other, should notify the editorial staff and give up the peer-review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscript submitted for peer review should be treated as a confidential document. It must be shown to other peer-reviewers or discussed with other experts, by observing the ethical standards and preserving the anonymity of the authors.
Objectivity standards
Reviews of scientific papers should be objective. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewer should thus be guided by the policy of the journal's editorial board and the guidelines for authors on how to prepare the manuscript to be submitted for publication.
Confirmation of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published works in the peer-reviewed material, which have not been cited by the authors. Any statements, conclusions, or arguments that have been previously used elsewhere must be appropriately presented as quotations. The reviewer must also draw the editor's attention to any substantial or partial similarity with any other work of which he/she has personal knowledge.
Disclosure of information and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript must not be used in a peer reviewer's studies without the author's written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not take part in the consideration and evaluation of manuscripts in which they are personally interested.
Indexation
Articles in «Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii» are indexed by several systems:
- Russian Scientific Citation Index (RSCI) – a database, accumulating information on papers by Russian scientists, published in native and foreign titles. The RSCI project is under development since 2005 by “Electronic Scientific Library” foundation (elibrary.ru).
- Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. The Google Scholar index includes most peer-reviewed online journals of Europe and America's largest scholarly publishers, plus scholarly books and other non-peer reviewed journals.
- Scopus
- Dimensions
- DOAJ
- RNMJ.RU
- EBSCO
- Cyberleninka
- VINITI RAS
- WorldCat
- East View
- SOCIONET
Publishing Ethics
The editors of the scholarly journal "Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii" (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics) work in accordance with the international ethical principles of academic publishing, which include the rules of confidentiality and vigilance over publications, as well as consideration of potential conflicts of interest and legal norms. The editorial board follows in its activities the Code of the Committee on Publication Ethics (http://publicationethics.org/,http://publicet.org/) work in accordance with the international ethical principles of academic publishing, which include the rules of confidentiality and vigilance over publications, as well as consideration of potential conflicts of interest and legal norms. The editorial board follows in its activities the Code of the Committee on Publication Ethics (http://publicationethics.org/, http://publicet.org/) and draws on the valuable experience of authoritative international journals and publishers.
he Publication Ethics Code includes and discloses the general principles and guidelines followed by academic publishing participants, such as authors, peer reviewers, editors, publishers, distributors, and readers, in their relationships.
Publication Ethics is a system of the behavioral norms of authors, peer reviewers, editors, publishers, and readers in writing, distributing, and using scholarly publications.
Duties of Authors
An author (or a group of authors) realizes that he/she is primarily responsible for the novelty and validity of research results, which presumes the observance of the following principles:
- To present valid results of the work done and an objective discussion of the importance of the study. The data used as the basis for investigations must be clearly set out in writing. The article must contain sufficient information so that other investigators can verify and replicate experiments. Fraudulent or patently untrue statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
- To give initial data for editorial review, when the occasion requires. The authors must be ready to provide free access to these data, if possible, and in any case to keep the initial materials within some time that has elapsed after their publication.
- To submit original articles only. When the textual or graphic information obtained from other people's works is used, there is a need for references to the corresponding publications or for an author's written permission. Any kind of plagiarism and excessive borrowings constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
- To necessarily indicate that their article is published for the first time. If some elements of the manuscript have been previously published elsewhere, the authors must refer to the earlier work and point to what extent the new paper differs from the previous one. Copying word for word and paraphrasing own works are unacceptable; they may be used only as the basis for new conclusions. Simultaneously submitting the article to more than one journal constitutes unethical and is unacceptable.
- To necessarily acknowledge the contribution of all people who have affected the course of a study in one way or another; the article must provide, among other things, references to the works that have been of importance for this investigation. Information privately obtained through talks, correspondence, or discussion with third parties must not be used without explicit written permission from the author.
- Coauthors of the article must list all people who have made a substantial contribution to an investigation. People who have not participated in the investigation may not be mentioned among the coauthors. Those who have taken part in some important aspects of a research project should be included in a list of its participants. The author must guarantee that the names of all coauthors and participants of the project are in the relevant lists and that all coauthors have acquainted with the final version of their scholarly article and approved it, as well as given their consent to its publication.
- If an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the article during its consideration or after its publication, he/she must notify the editorial board about this as soon as possible.
- Authors must adhere to the bioethical principles when examining animals as objects.
All authors must disclose in their works information on any financial and other significant conflicts of interest that will be able to influence study results and their interpretation. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Authors must provide a written assurance that the manuscript submitted to the journal office contains no information that is able to lead to conflicts of interest due to possible relations with industrial and financial organizations. It is desirable to list the sources of funding for the work. If there is no conflict of interest, the authors should state that "The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest". A conflict of interest arises when an author (or his/her institution), a peer reviewer or an editor have financial or personal relationships that negatively affect actions and decision-making. Not all of these relationships entail conflicts of interest.
There may be a possibility of conflicts of interest regardless of whether a person considers that these relationships affect his/her scientific judgements or not. Financial relationships (such as employment, consulting, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert judgements) are the most easily identifiable examples of conflicts of interest, which can undermine the credibility of the journal, specific authors, and science as a whole. However, conflicts can also occur for other reasons, such as personal relationships, detection of plagiarism, competition in an academic environment, etc.
Duties of Editors
Publication decisions
Submission of an article for consideration implies that it contains authors' new nontrivial research results that have not been previously published elsewhere. Each article should be peer reviewed. Experts are able to freely express their motivated criticisms regarding the level and clarity of the submitted material, its compliance with the journal profile, novelty, and validity of results. Peer-reviewers' recommendations are the basis for the final publication decision at a meeting of the journal's Editorial Board. The latter is fully responsible for a publication decision. Guided by the journal's policy and the current Copyright Law, the Editorial Board makes its decision to publish the article. It evaluates manuscripts exclusively for their scientific content regardless of authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, or political views. The article that has been accepted for publication is placed in the print edition of the journal and electronic access in accordance with the journal's adopted policy on distribution.
Fundamental errors in published works - When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the editor of " Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii" journal and cooperate with Publisher to retract or correct the paper, If the editor or the publisher learn from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper.
For the entire duration of copyright, an author (coauthors) or a declared second party (company, institution, employer, etc.) transfers the Editorial Board the exclusive rights to use the article, which are referred to in Article 16 of the Russian Federation's Law on Copyright and Related Rights, including, but not limited, the right to publish, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, or otherwise use the article and its material in the electronic and print editions of the journal and derivative works worldwide in Russian and English and in all current and future medias.
- At the same time, the author (coauthors) or declared second party reserves the following rights:
- to patent and provide tradename rights to any processes (methods) and/or procedures described in the article;
- to include an article in whole or in part in synopses and dissertations;
- to make photo or electronic copies of the article for personal or professional uses, research promotions, or informational purposes, including their use in lecture halls and seminar rooms, provided that the copies are not offered for sale or systematically distributed (including e-mails) to third parties and/or outside the institution where they work (serve), teach, etc.;
- to include the article in learning aids used in the lecture halls and seminar rooms, for free dissemination of the article amongst students or to keep it electronically on a local server that can be assessed by students as both part of a study course and internal training programs;
- to keep electronically the materials of the article, which have not undergone an editorial peer review process, in a public domain. Such materials may be placed on electronic files at the website of the author or at the secure website of his/her institution, but not for commercial sales or for any systematic external distribution by a third party (e.g.: a list server or database connected to a public access server). At the same time, the author must declare the following notice: "These are the materials of the article accepted for publication in the journal "Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii", year of publication, number". After its publication, the notice should be amended to read as follows: "The article is published in the journal "Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii" (including the complete citation information for the final version of the article, as published in the print (electronic) edition of the journal). In doing so, the author should provide an electronic link to the website of the journal office www.ped-perinatology.ru.
The right to place the final published version of article on a public server, such as the Internet, may be granted with the prior written permission of the Editorial Board. - after the article is published, the author has the right to personally use the it or any part thereof in the print collection of his/her works, by necessarily referring to the journal;
- if the article is a work made for hire (a commissioned work), the employer may use the entire information of the article or any part thereof within his/her organization (company);
- to make a report at a meeting or conference and to hand out the journal copies of the article to the participants of such events;
- to prepare derivative publications, by using individual figures or tables, text passages (250 words each, excluding annotations) from the article, for personal use, teaching, or inclusion in another work, by necessarily referring to the right (copyright) of the Editorial Board and providing a complete reference to the journal.
If the article is commercially published, it is necessary to preliminarily apply for permission in writing to the Editorial Board. All paper and electronic copies made by an author (coauthors) within their rights reserved, as well as other means of communication should include a reference to the belonging of the rights of the Editorial Board and a complete reference to the journal.
An editor and entire editorial staff have no right to disclose information about submitted works to anybody other than the corresponding authors, peer reviewers, other editorial advisers and, if necessary, the publisher. The editor and editorial staff have no right to use unpublished materials from the submitted manuscript in their own studies without the author's written consent.
Duties of reviewers
Reviewing
All articles submitted to the journal office are peer reviewed by the members of the Editorial Board or invited experts. Peer review assists the editorial board in making editorial decisions. The number of reviews of each article is not limited. If the editor can see that the article has significant shortcomings that are not marked by a reviewer or he/she becomes aware of a conflict of interest or unethical behavior of the author or the reviewer and then sends the article to be re-reviewed. The journal 's Editorial Board makes a final decision on the publication of the article.
The review process is blind when the reviewers know who the author is, but the author does not know who the reviewer is.
By giving a reference to the article, the reviewer should:
- indicate whether the article is compliant with the journal's themes;
- evaluate the scientific level of the work:
- what original results this article contains;
- whether there are erroneous statements in the article;
- whether the reviewer assures himself/herself that this article is useful and relevant;
- whether the references to other authors' works, which can correctly determine the place of this article among other publications, are given,;
- assess the quality of article presentation:
- whether the title and abstract of the article correctly reflect its main content;
- whether the introduction formulates the object of an investigation;/li>
- whether the conclusion formulates the main conclusions of the article;
- whether any amendments to the text are needed;
- make one of the following conclusions on the work as a whole:
- the article may be published in the journal;
- the article can be published after the author finalizes its text;
- the article should be radically revised and considered for publication after peer re-review.
A negative review is made on a separate sheet of paper to be sent to the authors.
Based on the peer review of the article, the editors make one of the following decisions:
- to publish the article in the journal;
- to return the article to the authors to its finalization;
- to reject to publish the article.
In the article submitted for publication is rejected, it may be again accepted after its futher radical processing.
Effectiveness
Any peer reviewer appointed to assess the manuscript, who considers that his/her skills are not sufficient to make a decision in reviewing the article submitted or knows that its consideration will be delayed for one reason or other, should notify the editorial staff and give up the peer-review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscript submitted for peer review should be treated as a confidential document. It must be shown to other peer-reviewers or discussed with other experts, by observing the ethical standards and preserving the anonymity of the authors.
Objectivity standards
Reviews of scientific papers should be objective. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewer should thus be guided by the policy of the journal's editorial board and the guidelines for authors on how to prepare the manuscript to be submitted for publication.
Confirmation of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published works in the peer-reviewed material, which have not been cited by the authors. Any statements, conclusions, or arguments that have been previously used elsewhere must be appropriately presented as quotations. The reviewer must also draw the editor's attention to any substantial or partial similarity with any other work of which he/she has personal knowledge.
Disclosure of information and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript must not be used in a peer reviewer's studies without the author's written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not take part in the consideration and evaluation of manuscripts in which they are personally interested.
Founder
- Ltd. “The National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation”
- Non-profit organization “Russian Association of Pediatric Centers”
Publication Fee
Before submitting an article to the editorial office, please read not only the rules of the manuscript design, but also the rules of payment for publication.
We would like to inform you that we have canceled the fee for publishing articles in the journal, starting from No. 1-2025.
When uploading articles, the payment of 5,000 rubles for consideration for citizens of the Russian Federation is also canceled.
The tariff remains the same for foreign citizens – 8000 rubles for reviewing an article and 2000 rubles per page (computer text - 14 size, including a list of references, tables and figures, i.e. the full volume of the article) for publication.
Attention! The publication and acceptance of articles with the support of advertising companies is free of charge.
Dear foreign colleagues!
Our platform has a payment system via Sberbank.
By bank card:
To select payment for the product using a bank card, click the Order payment by bank card button.
Payment is made through SBERBANK PJSC using bank cards of the following payment systems:
- THE WORLD;
- VISA International;
- Mastercard Worldwide;
- JCB.
For payment (entering your card details) You will be redirected to SBERBANK's payment gateway. The connection to the payment gateway and the transfer of information is carried out in a secure mode using the SSL encryption protocol. If your bank supports the technology of secure Internet payments Verified By Visa, MasterCard SecureCode, MIR Accept, J-Secure, you may also need to enter a special password to make the payment.
This website supports 256-bit encryption. The confidentiality of the personal information provided is ensured by SBERBANK PJSC. The entered information will not be provided to third parties, except in cases stipulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation. Bank card payments are carried out in strict accordance with the requirements of the payment systems MIR, Visa Int., MasterCard Europe Sprl, JCB.
Pay by card Other payment method: PAYMENT
DETAILS. Purpose of payment: for article processing and publication
Payee: Limited Liability Company
"National pediatric Academy of science and innovation"
125412, Moscow, Taldomskaya str., 2, building 1
TIN 7743900332
Sberbank PJSC, Moscow
Address 40702810038040033860
C/c 30101810400000000225
BIC 044525225
CHECKPOINT 774301001
The payment can be made in any convenient way provided by law in your region.:
- through the bank to the employee by card or in cash;
- through ATM by card or cash;
- online banking – debit from the card (you will need to fill in all the bank details in the appropriate section) or point your smartphone at the QR code
The funds are transferred in advance to the current account of the National Pediatric Academy of Science and Innovation Limited Liability Company. After submitting a copy of the payment document to the editorial office, the article will be sent for further processing and preparation for publication.
Upload your articles on the journal's website or send them by e-mail directly to the editorial office. Please do not forget to follow the rules for sending the manuscript to the editorial office!
On the magazine's website, you can make a payment and get access to the full version of the magazine and a separate article.
Paid access, as well as a subscription to the magazine, is available on our partners' websites (see the Subscription section). Please note that it is now also possible to purchase the full version of the article and the issue as a whole on our magazine's website!
If you have any questions, please contact the editorial office of the journal PantelyushinaTV@zdrav.mos.ru
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Plagiarism detection
«Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii» use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.
Appeal
Authors have a right to appeal editorial decisions to accept or reject their articles.
Appeal mechanism
1. If the author disagrees with the editorial decision to accept or reject the article, he/she can write to the editorial office of the relevant journal, by providing the reasons for the appeal.
2. The Conflict Resolution Commission consisting of members of the journal’s Editorial Board considers the author’s appeal.
3. The editorial decision on the article can be changed in the cases that the author has provided the additional facts disregarded during the initial review of the article:
- the author has provided the additional manuscript material overlooked during the initial review of this article;
- the author has given information about a conflict of interests, which was not provided during the initial review of this article;
- the author expresses concern about a biased review.
4. If there are sufficient grounds, the Conflict Resolution Commission makes a proposal for the Editorial Board to change or remain valid the primary decision on the publication of the article.
5. If necessary, the editors may invite an additional reviewer to make a final decision.
6. The Conflict Resolution Commission (the journal’s Editorial Board) decides whether to accept or reject the article according to the results for reconsideration of the primary decision.
7. According to the results for reconsideration of the primary decision, the Editorial Board’s decision is final and not to be repeatedly appealed.
Article withdrawal
Withdrawal of an already published article is an extreme measure, which is applied when the facts that were unknown during review have been revealed: - the facts of violations of legislation and defamation are detected; - false or inaccurate data, especially those, the use of which can create health risks are found.
Mechanism for article withdrawal
1. Authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and publishers can initiate the withdrawal of an article through written communication to the journal that has published the article.
2. The Conflict Resolution Commission (Editorial Board) considers the appeal submitted.
3. The Conflict Resolution Commission of the journal makes a decision to withdraw a published article if there is enough evidence favoring its withdrawal.
4. The Conflict Resolution Commission notifies an article withdrawal initiator about the results of consideration of the appeal in writing.
5. If the Commission makes a decision to withdraw the article, the relevant journal publishes a notice about its withdrawal, indicating its metadata.
6. If the articles in the journal from which an article is withdrawn are indexed with any databases, into which a letter is sent stating that the article has been withdrawn, specifying the reasons for this.
Preprint and postprint Policy
Prior to acceptance and publication in «Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii», authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.
As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in «Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii» we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.
Glossary (by SHERPA)
